A study of benefit and cost analyis of the composting andthermalde composition for organic waste management
Keywords:
organic waste, waste management, composting, pyrolysis, cost-benefit analysisAbstract
Awareness of Indonesian people about waste management is low, specifically in organic waste management. Organic waste management is relatively easy. On the other hand, open dumping and open burningare always choices by the community or person. These techniques are not sustainable actions, for the environment, even for living things. Waste could be managed sustainably, i.e., composting and thermal decomposition (pyrolisis). Composting produces organic fertilizer that is saleable and profitable. Thermal decomposition (pyrolysis) potentially have three product, bio-oil, bio-char, and syngas. These products are marketable and promising too. This research aims to study the potential application of composting and thermal decomposition technology on a small-neighborhood scale based on cost-benefit analysis.The study used benefit-cost analyis. Data is collected by literature study, from national and internasional journal, law product and govermnet policies.This study was occupied to one of the urban village in Pamekasan Sub-district, Pamekasan Regency. The study resulted that composting required more areathan pyrolisis. It is a constraint criteria to consider applying composting method in Tempat PengolahanSampah Reduce, Reuse, Recycle (TPS 3R).Sosial cost green house gas (GHG) was the biggest component that contributed to total costabout 95.56%. Meanwhile, in total benefit, benefit sale of product solid waste treatment was the biggestat 80.80%. Pyrolisis was more feasible than composting based on Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR)value. The composting duration was the limitation factor that affect BCR value negative (less than 1). It indicated to sustainabilty running, TPS 3R should be subsidize on investment andoperational cost.To achieve maximal benefit, composting should applied in household level. Sharing responsibilities between household level and TPS 3R management about percetage of processing organic waste should be implemented. It could level out household participation on solid waste management.
References
Abdel-Shafy, H. I., & Mansour, M. S. M. (2018). Solid waste issue: Sources, composition, disposal, recycling, and valorization. Dalam Egyptian Journal of Petroleum(Vol. 27, Nomor 4, hlm. 1275–1290). Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2018.07.003Ashlihah, A., Saputri, M. M., & Fauzan, A. (2020). Pelatihan Pemanfaatan Limbah Rumah Tangga Organik menjadi Pupuk Kompos. Jumat: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Bidang Pertanian , 1(1), 30–33.Babalola, M. A. (2020). A benefit-cost analysis of food and biodegradable waste treatment alternatives: The case of Oita City, Japan. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051916Boardman, A. E., Greenberg, D. H., Vining, A. R., & Weimer, D. L. (2018). Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice (5th ed.). Cambridge University Press.Ding, H. S., & Jiang, H. (2013). Self-heating co-pyrolysis of excessive activated sludge with waste biomass: Energy balance and sludge reduction. Bioresource Technology, 133, 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2013.01.090Djukic, M., Jovanoski, I., Ivanovic, O. M., Lazic, M., & Bodroza, D. (2016). Cost-benefit analysis of an infrastructure project and a cost-reflective tariff: A case study for investment in wastewater treatment plant in Serbia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 59, 1419–1425. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2016.01.050Iskandar, T., & Rofiatin, U. (2017). KARAKTERISTIKBIOCHAR BERDASARKAN JENIS BIOMASSA DAN PARAMETER PROSES PYROLISIS. Jurnal Teknik Kimia, 12(1), 28–34.Kementerian PUPR. (2017). PETUNJUK TEKNIS TPS 3R (Tempat Pengolahan Sampah 3R). Direktorat Pengembangan PLP .Lawa, J. I. J., Mangangka, I. R., & Riogilang, H. (2021). Perencanaan Tempat Pengolahan Sampah (TPS) 3R Di Kecamatan Mapanget Kota Manado. TEKNO, 19(78), 77–89.Liu, C., Zhang, Q., & Wang, H. (2020). Cost-benefit analysis of waste photovoltaic module recycling in China. Waste Management, 118, 491–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.08.052Liu, J., Bai, H., Liang, H., Wang, Y., & Xu, H. (2018). How to recycle the small waste household appliances in China? A revenue-expenditure analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 137, 292–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2018.06.015Meidiana, C., & Gamse, T. (2010). Development of Waste Management Practices in Indonesia. European Journal of Scientific Research, 40(2), 199–210. http://www.eurojournals.com/ejsr.htmMuyassir, M., Manfarizah, M., Jufri, Y., & Khairani, C. (2021). PEMBUATAN KOMPOS, BIOCHAR DAN MOL UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KESEJAHTERAAN MASYARAKAT DI KECAMATAN INGIN JAYAACEH BESAR. Rambideun: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(3), 133–144.Owade, J. O., Abong’, G. O., Okoth, M.W., & Mwang’ombe, A. W. (2022). A benefit-cost analysis approach for determining the optimal processing of micronutrient-enriched cowpea leaf soup mixes. Frontiers in Food Science and Technology, 2(874557), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/frfst.2022.874557Papadopoulos, A. E., Stylianou, M. A., Michalopoulos, C. P., Moustakas, K. G., Hapeshis, K. M., Vogiatzidaki, E. E. I., & Loizidou, M. D. (2009). Performance of a new household composter during in-home testing. Waste Management, 29(1), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.03.016Phelia, A., & Damanhuri, E. (2019). KAJIAN EVALUASI TPA DAN ANALISIS BIAYA MANFAAT SISTEM PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH
DI TPA (STUDI KASUS TPA BAKUNG KOTA BANDAR LAMPUNG). Jurnal Teknik Lingkungan, 25(2), 85–100.Phelia, A., & Sinia, R. O. (2021). Skenario Pengembangan Fasilitas Sistem Pengolahan Sampah Dengan Pendekatan Cost Benefit Analysis Di Kelurahan Kedamaian Kota Bandar Lampung. Serambi Engineering, 6(1), 1555–1562.Sarwar, G., Hussain, N., Schmeisky, H., & Muhammad, S. (2007). USE OF COMPOST AN ENVIRONMENT FRIENDLY TECHNOLOGY FOR ENHANCING RICE-WHEAT PRODUCTION IN PAKISTAN. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 39(5), 1553–1558.Shukor, F. S. A., Mohammed, A. H., Sani, S. I. A., & Awang, M. (2011). A REVIEW ON THE SUCCESS FACTORS FOR COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT. International Conference on Management (ICM 2011) Proceeding, 963–976.Suharno, Wardoyo, S., & Anwar, T. (2021). Perbedaan Penggunaan Komposter An-Aerob dan Aerob Terhadap Laju Proses Pengomposan Sampah Organik. Poltekita : Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan, 15(3), 251–255. https://doi.org/10.33860/jik.v15i3.527Wahana, S., & Intan Savitri, M. (2019). Harga Pokok Produksi Kompos Potensial Limbah Media Jamur Merang Kampung Padamaran Kecamatan Susukan Kabupaten Cirebon. Paradigma Agribisnis, 2(1), 34–42.Wahyudi, J., Perencanaan, B., Daerah, P., Pati, K., Raya, J., Km, P.-K., & Tengah, P. 59163 J. (2019). EMISI GAS RUMAH KACA (GRK) DARI PEMBAKARAN TERBUKA SAMPAH RUMAH TANGGA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL IPCC. Jurnal Litbang, 15(1), 65–76.Widyarsana, I. M. W., & Zafira, A. D. (2015). KAJIAN PENGEMBANGAN SISTEM PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH DI KABUPATEN TANGERANG. Jurnal Teknik Lingkungan, 21(1), 87–97.Xin, L., Qin, Y., Lou, T., Xu, X., Wang, H., Mei, Q., & Wu, W. (2023). Rapid start-up and humification of kitchen waste composting by an innovative biodrying-enhanced process. Chemical Engineering Journal, 452, 139459. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2022.139459Zaman, B., Hadiyanti, N., Purwono, & Ramadan, B. S. (2022). An innovative thermal composter to accelerate food waste decomposition at the household level. Bioresource Technology Reports, 19, 101203. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BITEB.2022.101203Zhou, J.M. (2017). The Effect of Different C/N Ratios on the Composting of Pig Manure and Edible Fungus Residue with Rice Bran. Compost Science and Utilization, 25(2), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/1065657X.2016.1233081Zorpas, A. A., Lasaridi, K., Pociovalisteanu, D. M., & Loizia, P. (2018). Monitoring and evaluation of prevention activities regarding household organics waste from insular communities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3567–3577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.155
Downloads
Submitted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 The Author (s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author whose published manuscript approved the following provisions:
1. The right of publication of all material published in the journal / published in the Agroindustrial Technology Journal is held by the editorial board with the knowledge of the author (moral rights remain the author of the script).
2. The formal legal provisions for access to digital articles of this electronic journal are subject to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), which means that Agroindustrial Technology Journal reserves the right to save, transmit media or format, Database), maintain, and publish articles without requesting permission from the Author as long as it keeps the Author's name as the owner of Copyright.
3. Printed and electronically published manuscripts are open access for educational, research and library purposes. In addition to these objectives, the editorial board shall not be liable for violations of copyright law.
